Personal and private ideas that may burst, sprout, and grow from Hard Work Hour with Douglas Douglas on BlogTalkRadio, The Philip DeFranco Show, modern cinema, KCET, John Stewart. Stephen Colbert, Science Daily, a diet very low in fresh vegetables, web browsing, KQED, MHz Networks, Folsom Fair, chemical imbalances, KPFK, NPR, Public Television, NASA, and John McLaughlin (RIP).
Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 29, 2013
slut walk notes
According to the IRC report, many women and girls spoke of being attacked in public or in their homes, mainly by armed men, with rapes - sometimes by multiple perpetrators - often occurring in front of family members. There have been attacks in which women and young girls were kidnapped, raped, tortured and killed, while roadblocks in Syria have become especially dangerous for females, it added.
http://www.trust.org/trustlaw/news/interview-scale-of-rape-in-syria-war-may-shock-irc/
Labels:
intolerance,
slut,
slutwalk,
violence,
walk
Wednesday, January 23, 2013
VP Biden addresses Gun Control
Vice President Joe Biden will take questions on the issue tomorrow ala Philip DeFranco. My contribution:
Mr. Vice President, can we assume that the perpetrators who shoot children in schools are angry and hoping for some attention at any cost? They want to show their hurt and their middle finger to the world and they know that the media will blast the story all over if they are wild and brutal enough. Assuming this is part of the context, why not remove it? Why not try for a trial period of, say, five years, any school shooting is a local story only? The FCC is supposed to serve the public managing the public airwaves. Why not levy penalties just like are in place now for profane language? Less coverage may mean less violence. Thoughts?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/109092180987236182034?e
Mr. Vice President, can we assume that the perpetrators who shoot children in schools are angry and hoping for some attention at any cost? They want to show their hurt and their middle finger to the world and they know that the media will blast the story all over if they are wild and brutal enough. Assuming this is part of the context, why not remove it? Why not try for a trial period of, say, five years, any school shooting is a local story only? The FCC is supposed to serve the public managing the public airwaves. Why not levy penalties just like are in place now for profane language? Less coverage may mean less violence. Thoughts?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/109092180987236182034?e
Labels:
control,
discussion,
gun,
legislation,
violence
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)